> ...and that's just a price we agree to pay for privacy, security, and liberty. I think this is fine here, but I am compelled to point out and remind, given t

> ...and that's just a price we agree to pay for privacy, security, and liberty. I think this is fine here, but I am compelled to point out and remind, given the amount of concurrence in the thread: In a more rigorous discussion, I think this is a particularly dangerous line of thinking to the Stallman-level advocate and their campaign down the line. Edit (oops. Chopped off a long version of this paragraph when I edited down the post): Privacy, security, and liberty are maintained by the advocate to be the natural rights that are paid in price for justice. This isn't to speak of those in agreement here or myself (and not just limited to said advocate), but on the part of anyone that uses such framing, for risk of it massively normalizing, even if I find it an artistically made point.