4 ms·
Yeah, I don't agree with their analysis of Disney+ either. It's as you say, these big corps are trying to claw back revenue that Netflix has been enjoying. I
by three_seagrass 7y ago
Yeah, I don't agree with their analysis of Disney+ either. It's as you say, these big corps are trying to claw back revenue that Netflix has been enjoying.
I doubt the reason Disney really went into Disney+ was to enhance the Disney magic experience or whatever. Maybe if Walt were still alive. It seems more likely that Disney did the cost/benefit analysis and decided that Netflix subscriptions were not zero sum and that parents would definitely pay for another subscription for Frozen and other shows.
- TrainedMonkey 7y agoDisney+ is more than just a revenue stream. It is a sales channel for their brand. If you have Disney+ you are going to watch more Disney content... and if you watch more content you are going to buy more merchandise (0). Modern Disney is a brand company making money from selling merchandise (1). Even more importantly Disney+ is a platform. Most little girls in western countries (3) already dream of being a princess. So if you provide a channel which parents can subscribe to put their kids in front of the TV... that is a tremendous value proposition for both sides. Parents because kids are out of their hair while watching family friendly shows and disney because see my previous point. 0. In my humble opinion. I have not done any research, but having disney+ -> watching more disney -> becoming a fan and buying their stuff makes sense to me. 1. $54.7bn from merchandise in 2019 with next highest revenue source bringing in $24.8bn - https://www.statista.com/topics/1824/disney/ https://www.statista.com/topics/1824/disney/ 3. Like every single 5 yo girl I've met... which is actually not a big number, so maybe not most little girls, but still a pretty sizeable portion.
- three_seagrass 7y agoUntil you can purchase merchandise inside Disney+ it's as much a sales channel as HBO Go is for Game of Thrones.