I like that you're open to holding ambiguity around this. There are few things we should proclaim with certainty, and "5g is 100% biologically harmless" doesn'

I like that you're open to holding ambiguity around this. There are few things we should proclaim with certainty, and "5g is 100% biologically harmless" doesn't seem to be one of them, yet. >who benefits from the "anti-5G" coordinated effort? Some: Scientist who've staked their reputation against 5g, disadvantaged telecom co's, conspiracy theorists/media who prey on fear, gov't who don't like the social direction connectivity is taking us (populus' can 'wake up' increasingly quickly).