3 ms·
>the cost per unit of computation or storage was the floor on the cost of computers. What do you mean? That the energy bill for computers is bigger than the ma
by toohotatopic 7y ago
>the cost per unit of computation or storage was the floor on the cost of computers.
What do you mean? That the energy bill for computers is bigger than the material bill?
What else but the price of the hardware has determined the price of computers?
>I expect PV to drive the levelized cost of power below $0.01/kWh
For some time, this is possible. But if there is a sea of energy, people will find a way to use it. Then, demand rises and prices will rise again.
Sooner or later, material science, genetics and everything else will simulate everything. Progress will depend on the amount of energy that is spent on those calculations. The cloud will take any energy that it can get. Bitcoin was just the start.
Humans take roughly 2kWh worth of food per day. We are willing to pay about $20 for it. It might as well be that energy prices rise to $10/kWh. Not because PV itself is expensive, but because somebody owns the land where the PV modules are standing.
- pfdietz 7y agoWhat I meant was clear (and not what you wrote there.) Jevon does not say that prices cannot fall. So if you're trying to use it to say prices will not fall, you're doing it all wrong.
- toohotatopic 7y ago>What I meant was clear Unfortunately not to me.