11 ms·
Off topic: Can anyone explain why the dow jones is going up? The dow was LOWER Jan 1st 2019. I feel we are worse off than Jan 1st 2019.
by ransom1538 7y ago
Off topic: Can anyone explain why the dow jones is going up? The dow was LOWER Jan 1st 2019. I feel we are worse off than Jan 1st 2019.
- bhupy 7y agoFed just announced another $2.3T in loans for small businesses.
- Mountain_Skies 7y agoNo where else for the money to go?
- mylons 7y agoThe Fed is dumping cash into the financial system
- PeterStuer 7y agoBecause they expect the US is going to pour unlimited amounts of cash into propping up their ponzi-scheme?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- blat001 7y agoBecause of business loans and tax breaks it looks like companies will come out of this profitable and the government will pay for the workers during this period.
- Waterluvian 7y agoIf anyone can "explain" it, they should go get filthy rich. But we can speculate in a semi-educated way. I think my best speculation is that the economy's fall factored in uncertainty about how bad this really is. The sell-off was based on worst case scenarios (given such high uncertainty). Now that uncertainty is going down as we understand it all better, have more data, have plans in place, the economy is recovering to a more accurate, "this is actually what this whole ordeal will cost us"
- baron_harkonnen 7y ago> Now that uncertainty is going down Spot price does nothing to measure uncertainty. Volatility is still very high which means, by definition, we are in an uncertain market. A much better explanation for the dow rising is the opposite of what you propose: we don't really know how this will impact things so it's very hard to price all of this in. Investors already known that unemployment claims this week would be awful so that information is already priced in, but we're still really waiting on information about how all of these impacts will impact businesses as a whole.
- ajross 7y agoMaybe. Personally, I think the median investor, especially the median short term investor, tends to be more optimistic than the rational market hypothesis would argue. Information availability isn't symmetric, and the news sources favored by these people tend to paint rosier pictures of the recovery than seem likely. I mean, one very straightforward interpretation of the headline of this linked article is that Yelp will be seeing a 30-40% shortfall in revenue for the medium term future (i.e. long enough to make the firing and hiring process worthwhile). At its worst, the market was guessing at a 38% drop in valuation, and it's now recovered significantly from that. My guess, and no I'm not buying puts to test it, is that we're going to see another series of shocks to the market when the revenue numbers start being reported and the big employers start running out of money and shutting things down. Right now the immediate job losses are all in the service sector and small employers, and those jobs are basically invisible to your typical trader bro.
- enraged_camel 7y agoI agree. For example, we have just started to see only some of the second-order effects, as a huge number of people missed their April rent payments, and mortgage default rates started to shoot upwards. Consumer spending is similarly tanking; people can't buy the newest iPhones when they don't have jobs. I think Q1 numbers will start to shake people out of their optimism. We'll see.
- bhupy 7y ago> Right now the immediate job losses are all in the service sector and small employers, and those jobs are basically invisible to your typical trader bro. Most of this activity is driven by robotic trades by institutional investors. It's largely quantitative. Whether the quantitative priors are accurate, is debatable.
- ydnaclementine 7y agoit's priced in
- raister 7y agoEvery 10 years or so there is a 'catastrophic' event, so markets fluctuate, players are invited to get out, new players emerge and life goes on and on and on Next one is around 2030 - see ya !
- cfqycwz 7y agoConstant revolutionising of production, uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions, everlasting uncertainty and agitation distinguish the bourgeois epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed, fast-frozen relations, with their train of ancient and venerable prejudices and opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify. All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life, and his relations with his kind.
- NicoJuicy 7y agoEvery 8 years normally, this one was already long overdue
- gt565k 7y agoQuarterly earnings coming out, better than expected numbers of covid-19 deaths compared to initial models, rumors that 2nd stimulus bill is to expand small business loans liquidity program.
- komali2 7y agoBecause people are buying stocks at higher prices than yesterday, and selling stocks at higher prices than yesterday.
- taf2 7y agoMy guess is hope that we are almost through the worst of this and as yesterday Hopkins announced trial a possible treatment - people are also trying to get in while it is low
- daxorid 7y agoThe Federal Reserve is printing $90B per day (on average) in open-ended QE. This liquidity is used to take agency paper and treasuries off the hands of primary dealers and hedge funds. In turn, the managers of these organizations refuse to sit on cash, so they grab other assets. Some (large) percentage of these assets will be equities. Anecdotally, retail investors also appear to be buying the dip in volume, though we need more recent fund flows data to see if reality reflects anecdotes.
- sciencewolf 7y agohttps://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-announces-new-facilities-to-support-2-3-trillion-in-lending-11586435450 https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-announces-new-facilities-to...
- BozeWolf 7y agoIt has been like this for days. Super weird, of course there are explanations, i am just not sure if they are correct. So apparently the fed announced more financial measures. Which might cause some optimism. Also rumour has it there is a chance that the oil 'crisis' will be solved. Also investors might be short sighted and think this will only take a few months. Who knows. To me it feels totally incorrect, reading all the other news would mean stocks should go down. This crisis is a bit different though, it is not a financial crisis, which takes a while until it hits the real economy. I think nobody is entirely sure what is happening.
- ShorsHammer 7y agoAssets aren't worth more, money is now dramatically worth less. You measure one with the other. Here's a long term graph of the Feds balance sheet: https://www.ft.com/content/ec10b41a-84af-4e44-ad3f-5bb86b6e1eaa https://www.ft.com/content/ec10b41a-84af-4e44-ad3f-5bb86b6e1... Here's the Australian Central Bank's current balance sheet: https://i.redd.it/h7bdffj8gqr41.png https://i.redd.it/h7bdffj8gqr41.png This is playing out across the planet and will likely have the same market distorting effects as a decade ago.
- CPLX 7y agoProbably because this crisis will consolidate corporate power in the hands of big business. The divide between big and small business in this scenario is stark. For companies that have access to bond markets and the stock market massive amounts of cash are being deployed to prop things up. Small businesses are in complete free fall, with a non-functional short term confusing payroll assistance loan plan that has yet to lend to anyone in effect. The writing is very clearly on the wall. Hundreds of thousands of small businesses will fail, and that will further tip market share towards larger companies, conglomerates, chains, and similar. When you invest in the stock market you are investing in those larger businesses.
- hkmurakami 7y agoReports just came out that OPEC+ is more likely to reach a deal than was expected just a few hours ago. Virtual meeting started around 10am EST. But yeah tbh no one really knows
- nicbou 7y agoThis is the part that completely evades me. The economy ground to a halt worldwide, 6 million new unemployment claims are processed every week in the US, established startups are on life support, more and more small businesses are collapsing... ...and the stocks are green.
- outlace 7y agoMy guess: because speculators are speculating that the recent severe dips in the stock market are undervaluing the economy and therefore are buying when it goes low, propping up the price. Speculators speculate that the pandemic has not actually destroyed any significant real value in the economy and will bounce back, therefore the stock dips are overreactions and are good buying opportunities.
- bsurmanski 7y agomy guess is that people that are well off (rich) still have their income stream. A lot of tech workers, CEOs, etc are working from home. It's poor (or middle class) people (working in retail, tourism, food) that are disproportionately affected by this. In 2008, it hit rich people first, then "trickled down". So, the rich are seeing this as an opportunity to offload some extra cash onto the discounted markets.
- wikiman 7y agoThe market is reactive to relatively short-term inputs. I'm looking at a few things that are causing the jump: - Some of it is inflationary as others have pointed out. There's a lot of money entering the system right now, and markets tend to go up on that - Some of it is short sellers realizing gains from the last month and exiting their trades (the effect of closing a short causes markets to rise) - Some of it is psychological reactions to dropping death estimates, and concurrent optimism that things will go back to "normal" soon (or at least sooner than previously thought) What the market did 12/21/18 is sort of irrelevant
- xienze 7y agoMaybe you missed the ~40% drop it sustained in about a month's time? That happened when it looked like the world was ending and 2 million people were supposed to die in the US. Now that things are looking better, the stock market is improving.
- jerf 7y agoAlong with the cynical, pessimistic, and snarky answers, bear in mind the market does not reflect what is happening now. It reflects an averaged, time-value-of-money-weighted assessment of what the market participants think it's going to happen in the future. So, despite what you may naturally think, the market crash wasn't reflecting the fact many people aren't working right now, it was reflecting the fear that we could be knocked out for months. Now fears about the worst-case scenario are receding, so the time-averaged result rises as the result of the worst bottom elements lifting, even if the overall assessment is still problematic.
- chewz 7y agoIt is called bear rally. It happens all the time during sell out (1929, 2008). At some point shorts close their positions en masse. It doesn't stop the market from falling further later... https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-big-of-a-bear-market-rally-in-stocks-you-can-expect-according-to-nine-decades-of-history-2020-04-01 https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-big-of-a-bear-ma...
- not_a_moth 7y agoBecause Fauci said earlier today expected US fatalities has been down revised to 60k Meaning it's not as bad as we all thought in previous weeks when millions were predicted to die
- mattkrause 7y agoAnd/or the interventions have been working.
- not_a_moth 7y agoThe model that was down revised already took into account the interventions
- mattkrause 7y agoGot an article? CNN is saying almost exactly the opposite: https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/08/politics/deborah-birx-social-distancing-models/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/08/politics/deborah-birx-social-... Birx continued, "is how important behavioral change is, and how amazing Americans are at adapting to and following through on these behavioral changes." "That's what's changing the rate of new cases, and that's what will change the rate of mortality going forward," she said.
- not_a_moth 7y agoBeen following the guy from the Big Short, Michael Burry, who has been going deep in the data and models, and trying to raise awareness. He tweeted today how Fauci and the mainstream media glossed over how the models already took into account the interventions: https://twitter.com/michaeljburry/status/1248244146571116545 https://twitter.com/michaeljburry/status/1248244146571116545
- mattkrause 7y agoI can't find anything concrete there, but "already took into account" is a bit weaselly. There had to be tons of uncertainty in a) how well people comply with the guidelines and b) how effective that compliance is. It certainly doesn't seem crazy to me more data would lead to revised values for those factors. They could be more effective than originally expected. It could also just narrow the prediction interval--I'd bet that a lot of the "millions dead" stuff is reporting the high end, rather than the most likely outcome.
- double-a 7y agoBecause the market is not pricing this as a signal that the "sum of all future free cash flow" is in jeopardy. Governments all over the world have implemented financial relief to these companies by promising to shoulder the cost of wages through the normal unemployment benefit system. Companies taking advantage of that during this extraordinary period doesn't say much about what their profitability will look like after the lockdowns are over. In fact, in some cases this could be evidence of a flexible company that is able to scale down quickly and is more likely to survive this and future demand shocks.
- Xcelerate 7y agoTotally out of my field here, but is it possible the stock market doesn’t actually track the economy anymore? Stocks don’t pay dividends that often nowadays; it doesn’t seem to be so much an investment as a guess about where other people think the price is going to go. I mean, what does Bitcoin track, or the price of art? It almost seems arbitrary.
- hckr_news 7y agoKai Ryssdal often states "the market is not the economy"
- compiler-guy 7y ago"Anymore"... It never really did. The two are correlated somewhat, but there has always been a great variance within that correlation, and it is no different now.
- throw_this_one 7y agoSince big companies can raise capital with really low interest rates... isn't the stock market basically a big Casino game? Name of the game is to guess what everybody else is gonna do and come out ahead. Most are just investing for a return. Seems pointless.
- SiFiPi 7y agoBecause Ackman made a 1.5 billion dollar bet on a fast recovery, meaning that he invested this money into the markets. The stock market is not a good indicator of economic stability, but rather an indicator of how the top 2% of wealth in America is doing.
- kriro 7y agoThe FED announced a huge new stimulus package (as did the Bank of England earlier today). I'm also surprised because I'd expect stocks to tank because that's what would make economic sense to me. People at home, not spending money, unemployment soaring. So far I'd assume this situation has more of an impact on the actual economy than the financial crisis but the market seems to disagree. I guess the lesson here is that FED meddling/cheap money trumps all other factors. But that would mean eventually things should crash really fast. The best lesson from "The Alchemy of Finance" (my favorite investment book) is that the market just represents the current bias, not the true situation but eventually converges to the true situation. That's subtle but hard to grasp. At least it was for me. Or in other words...what makes economic sense isn't necessarily reflected in the current market prices (as the efficient market hypothesis would suggest).
- kevas 7y agoLiquidity injections from central banks, federal governments, risks of the virus are starting to be known, stairs up & elevator down tends to lead to an over reaction, price discovery, oil cuts possibly happening today with OPEC, the FED announced +2T in purchasing of junk debt this morning, and there are going to be companies coming out of this much stronger than before.
- stevenmays 7y agoI am speculating: 1) pricing in the return of US manufacturing. In a pandemic, it's every country for themselves. We've outsourced items critical for national sovereignty and the ability to respond to crises. I think left and right agrees now, that's a risk which needs to be mitigated. 2) govt has unprecedented support, in terms of small business loans and benefits 3) bonds and stocks are usually inversely correlated, they are not because the fed is buying up a significant portion of the debt, at low rates. Meaning your not getting much return if you hold bonds. 4) Capital flight from foreign markets. If you can't trust China, and emerging markets are going to get hit worse, then the US is where you want your money. 5) Less uncertainty. 6) More speculation that this virus is not as bad as we think. We're well below the expected deaths on the models, which means the models are wrong, by a factor of multiples.
- notyourday 7y ago> Can anyone explain why the dow jones is going up? That's easy: the market is betting the "help" is another mass wealth transfer from the bottom half of the population to the top half of the population. This happened every time we had a crisis. Why would a rational investor thing it would be different this time?
- fnord77 7y agoa lot of good answers here but one's missing: market effects of the underlying securities themselves. Supply and demand of actual stocks can affect price The biggest one is a short squeeze https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_squeeze https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_squeeze
- tomp 7y agoInvestors expect the FED to save them (Quantitative Easing 3.0, buy ETFs or stocks directly).
- takinola 7y agoCompany announces bad news and then the stock price goes UP. WTF? This often seems counter-intuitive but is pretty simple to understand if you keep in mind that markets are always forward looking. For instance, if Company A typically makes $1m in profits each year, you can ascribe a value to it. However, if at some point, you suspect that their profit is going to drop 80%, you are going to devalue their stock accordingly. However, if the company announces that their profit "only" dropped by 60%, you have likely undervalued them (since you thought it would be worse) and it makes sense for you to increase their price. So to get back to your initial question, the answer is the market thinks, right now, that things will not be as bad as they initially assessed.
- gnicholas 7y agoI think most of the time stock prices go up when layoffs are announced. If a company releases bad news about the business and simultaneously lays people off, that's a different story. But layoffs are seen as cost-cutting, and an indication that the company will be more profitable (or at least lose less money) in the future.
- calvinbhai 7y agoWell, Russia and Saudi Arabia have agreed to cut oil production. OPEC+ may follow soon. Hence the markets going super green. Most the bottom hunters are only following the Covid news. Oil prices are adding to the stock market swings big time.
- vkou 7y agoThe printing presses are printing trillions of dollars. Some of that is going out in what are essentially hand-outs (Which is fine), some of it is going out to buy equities (Which drives the prices up, and is absolutely disgusting), and some of it is going out in the form of loans to dead businesses which will have to be repaid (Which props up the market in the short term, but will turn the economy into a debt-servicing zombie over the next decade). Trump is desperate to not let the markets drop as part of his legacy, and the fed is doing everything in their power to not let the markets drop... Regardless of the long-term consequences. This is, of course, purely a coincidence. That's why you can have 16 million unemployed in two weeks, another two months of shutdown on the horizon, nobody buying anything, everyone sitting at home, landlords not getting paid, and yet have the market partying like it's 999.
- throwaway55554 7y agoPeople trying to time the market? They believe we hit the bottom already, maybe.
- adrianmonk 7y agoIn times of great uncertainty or upheaval, markets fluctuate up and down pretty wildly. Everybody realizes it should adjust to some new value to reflect the new reality. But nobody knows what that value is. So nobody is sure if the market has adjusted too far or not enough. So any time any new information comes in, people grasp at straws trying to make sense of the situation (and/or decide they have to act despite very limited information), and the market goes up and down. It doesn't just move smoothly in one direction and then gradually come to a stop once it finally reaches the new "correct"(-ish) value. It jerks back and forth as it gets there. So even when down is the inevitable direction, it's going to have a few ups mixed in.
- downvoteme1 7y agoBecause the fed is printing money and buying anything it wants. The fed is now buying junk bonds also.
- jb775 7y agoA few possible reasons: 1.) The gov has shown they aren't willing to let the market tank. 2.) Many businesses are actually thriving right now via online orders. This means every part of their associated supply chains are thriving as well. 3.) This is a temporary revenue setback but will make it socially acceptable to layoff employees by the thousands...which will trim payrolls without losing an equivalent amount of production. 4.) Non-retired people wouldn't dare touch their 401k before they are 59 1/2, which are primarily comprised of stocks. 5.) The market is predicting a surge of activity once this is all over. 6.) This situation shook out any major bubbles that were forming (e.g. stock buybacks), and made the market more anti-fragile. 7.) People now see the value of having more goods on hand in their homes, which will probably mean increased initial spending when this is over.
- diebeforei485 7y agoBecause the government is injecting lots of money.