2 ms·
> to encourage success Scammers, arbitrage stock-traders, and opioid drug marketers can also achieve success... On the other hand, some endeavors "succeed" by
by einpoklum 7y ago
> to encourage success
Scammers, arbitrage stock-traders, and opioid drug marketers can also achieve success... On the other hand, some endeavors "succeed" by not-failing and being out of sight and out of mind, e.g. a plumbing installation. You don't think of your "daily plumbing success".
So, I'd say not success which should be encouraged, it is well-directed and well-applied effort.
PS - The plumbing example can well be adapted to nearly any pursuit, definitely including software.
- dgb23 7y ago> You don't think of your "daily plumbing success". Initially I had to laugh at this one, but why not? Robustness is something that seems to be very hard to measure, communicate and sell until something bad happens. I think one of the IT fields that is struggling with this is security, because the problem is most apparent there.
- yourapostasy 7y ago> Robustness is something that seems to be very hard to measure, communicate and sell until something bad happens. This is endemic to business and is especially widespread in contemporary American-style business, and the general case seems to be a failure in pricing all kinds of tail risk. I suspect a key challenge in this space is the unsolved principal agent problem. I think the principal agent problem is rampant because pricing information is extremely lossy information compression; only the grossest outcomes are recorded in the market. Those who exploit the principal agent problem rely upon externalities to succeed, and those externalities are not timely or fine-grained reflected in the compressed/price information. Reputation systems lossily add the missing information back into the market as a side-channel. But what externalities to record is a whole other can of worms.