To be clear, I'm not personally concerned about 5G, my point is that not everyone who has concerns about it is a conspiracy theorist. That I have shown. Beside

To be clear, I'm not personally concerned about 5G, my point is that not everyone who has concerns about it is a conspiracy theorist. That I have shown. Besides that, I have a problem with "the evidence is weak" arguments, because the evidence for anything is weak if you never have looked. The INTERPHONE study may be of high quality, but it didn't look into 5G. Extrapolating from that is insufficient. The fact of the matter is that proving the safety of 5G before rollout is not feasible. At best we can look back in ten or twenty years after rollout and draw our conclusions. That's how long it will take to actually get any good evidence, like the INTERPHONE study. By then, we'll probably have rolled out 6G and 7G, to unknown effect. > So great news, the evidence that 5G is potentially unsafe isn't really there. The evidence that 5G is unsafe isn't there. The evidence that it is safe isn't there either. It's still "potentially unsafe".