I think the suggestion that the failure was a question of timing, "positioning" and a poor launch is naive. It wasn't a very good product. It had some nifty fea

I think the suggestion that the failure was a question of timing, "positioning" and a poor launch is naive. It wasn't a very good product. It had some nifty features but they were all jumbled together into a mess that didn't solve real problems. Was Google even using it internally?