It's interesting that you bring up adverse selection issues, because I thought it would reduce them. 1. Can you explain why fan boys would be "bad" for Google?

It's interesting that you bring up adverse selection issues, because I thought it would reduce them. 1. Can you explain why fan boys would be "bad" for Google? 2. The argument was that if your probability of being accepted is greater than 4% (greater than their goal), you stand to gain more than you lose with their revenue-neutral provision. 3. Good point. This could be one of the false-negatives that the program introduces. Of course the PR side of things are the most difficult to handle. Colleges are allowed to do it, but companies may be put in bad light for it.