> Section 230's supporters constantly push hilariously insane narratives about it's importance, suggesting that without it companies would be inherently violati

> Section 230's supporters constantly push hilariously insane narratives about it's importance, suggesting that without it companies would be inherently violating the law any time one of their users violated the law, Can you explain in your own words what you think Section 230 actually does? Because yes, without it, that was very much the case (see Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Services Co.) unless the company decides not to moderate at all, which is not an Internet that most of us want.