4 ms·
The thing is, they don't have any information that you don't have access to, and they're not going to be able to set you up with anybody who does (e.g. a direct
by dangwu 7y ago
The thing is, they don't have any information that you don't have access to, and they're not going to be able to set you up with anybody who does (e.g. a director, VP, or CEO). Any information they do have is already publicly available. The company has 800K+ employees and any non-executive emails leak as soon as they're sent, if not simply made public immediately. Essentially, you're testing their ability to regurgitate corporate policies, which is completely pointless.
- pmiller2 7y agoIf $COMPANY finds themselves losing a significant number of candidates (at least some of whom they presumably need to hire), because they can't answer $QUESTION, and that information gets reported up the chain, what do you think $COMPANY's rational response is?
- dangwu 7y agoMaybe $COMPANY just expects their candidates to be able to use a search engine rather than quiz their recruiters on it, and anyone who can't do that is a non-regrettable loss.
- pmiller2 7y agoAnd $COMPANY expects candidates to even know to ask the questions without having to do a little reading? That does not seem very rational to me.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]