4 ms·
Bear (rar!) in mind this will only work if you have the uplink bandwidth to do so.
by TheDesolate0 6y ago
Bear (rar!) in mind this will only work if you have the uplink bandwidth to do so.
- loeg 6y ago"High"-bitrate lossy CBR compression is probably acceptable enough — at least compared with a voice codec! mp3 at max (320) is only 320 kB/s, doesn't have the security issues that variable-bitrate compression does, and preserves audio "ok" (it does delete the high frequencies above 20-22 kHz). No patent issues anymore, either. Ogg-Vorbis may be an even better option for all kinds of reasons, but mp3 is more universally recognized.
- clarry 6y agoMP3 and Vorbis have bad latency. There's not much reason not to use Opus, which has better quality/bitrate and lower latency.
- loeg 6y agoThat is a perfectly acceptable solution as well!
- pedrocr 6y agoSupposedly Opus supersedes all other codecs at all bit rates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_(audio_format)#/media/File:Opus_quality_comparison_colorblind_compatible.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_(audio_format)#/media/Fil... It should be a matter of giving it enough bandwidth and let it make good decisions based on that.