3 ms·
There is ongoing cost, sure -- that's why they don't stop selling new devices to interested customers, and making new versions of the devices to convince custom
by andrewla 7y ago
There is ongoing cost, sure -- that's why they don't stop selling new devices to interested customers, and making new versions of the devices to convince customers to upgrade.
If they need to justify the ongoing cost, they should charge an amount that they can amortize over the lifetime of the device -- if they expect to get $0.50 in ad revenue per year from each customer (which seems ridiculously high) then that means the device has to cost ~$20 more to support that, which I'm totally okay with. Maybe not everyone would be, but at some point you have to rely on the fact that you're not selling a commodity device; you're selling something that is better than your competitors, or else why bother?
- scarface74 7y agoSo if they keep selling to new customers, what happens when all of the customers who want one have one? Once you have a box that can stream 4K, why upgrade? Besides there are no more dumb TVs. All TVs are smart and are “good enough” for most people. True Roku is embedded in most lowend TVs but the licensing fee is minimal because of the thin profit margins of most TVs. Roku is a commodity device. Everything with an internet connection can stream Netflix and the other services that people care about.