3 ms·
The article says that this strategy is best fit for when most of the patients are negative. I'd like to see how the number of false-positive change given a chan
by luizfzs 7y ago
The article says that this strategy is best fit for when most of the patients are negative. I'd like to see how the number of false-positive change given a change in the number of patients that test negative (increase and decrease).
I'd also be interested in a comparison of how reliable it is compared with the current test strategy.
- pwoolf 7y agoThe interface has an encode/decode function that lets you explore different scenarios. For example for a small design (S3): https://www.smarterbetter.design/origamiassays/default/encode_decode_example?name=S3 https://www.smarterbetter.design/origamiassays/default/encod... Reliability is an interesting question. For the monoplex case, we put all of our eggs in one basket, so if we miss it once we miss it forever. In the multiplex scheme, we have the possibility of recovery because we build in multiple tests.