3 ms·
> But, sometimes, when we're not 100% sure if something is malicious or good we issue it a “challenge”. I think they meant “bot or human”, not “malicious or go
by cm2187 7y ago
> But, sometimes, when we're not 100% sure if something is malicious or good we issue it a “challenge”.
I think they meant “bot or human”, not “malicious or good”. Bot != malicious. And these challenges will do no good to non malicious bots.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- lucideer 7y agoI think you're confusing intent with implementation. You're right that the implementation excludes non-malicious bots and fails to solve for malicious humans, but that just makes it an imperfect implementation of the intent: which is to differentiate malicious & good.