3 ms·
I think that is being pedantic. No-one's going to misunderstand what the intended idempotency of GET is supposed to be.
by throwaway_pdp09 7y ago
I think that is being pedantic. No-one's going to misunderstand what the intended idempotency of GET is supposed to be.
- wlll 7y agoThis may tip the pedantry scale too far, but the comment you are replying to is in reply to a comment that suggests confusion over the idempotency of GET. I'm not suggesting that it's named wrong or anything like that, this is just about your comment.