2 ms·
It seems like the arguments made in the article would more readily support the idea that viruses are spontaneously forming on Earth than in space. If viruses ar
by cowboysauce 7y ago
It seems like the arguments made in the article would more readily support the idea that viruses are spontaneously forming on Earth than in space. If viruses are spontaneously forming on other planets or in interstellar space directly, then they should be forming on the Earth as well. I think the Earth is more likely for a number of reasons.
To start, viruses are generic material wrapped in proteins. The functionality of proteins depends on their shapes and the environment strongly affects the shape of a protein. Viruses that exist on Earth have proteins that are stable on Earth. A virus that comes from a different environment would be liable to fall apart on the Earth. RNA itself is pretty unstable by itself (hence why cells use DNA), but there are plenty of viruses that use it as their genetic material.
Infecting host cells is another matter. Viruses are generally pretty specific with their host cells. They enter host cells by binding to specific proteins on their surfaces. Once inside they take advantage of the specific cellular machinery present. For example, the polio virus has a single strand of RNA that codes for a single long polypeptide that is then sliced at specific point by host enzymes to produce the final viral proteins. Some viral proteins act to suppress the defenses of the cell and the immune system in general. An alien virus would be insanely lucky to be able to infect local life at all, let alone reproduce and spread. Unless life across the universe is incredibly similar.
Given these thoughts, it seems like it would be more likely for viruses to spontaneously form on Earth than another planet (or interstellar space). Viruses forming on Earth would have the advantage of starting with organic materials that already work with existing life. The Earth is generally protected from harsh radiation and extreme temperatures. The most important thing is that any forming viruses would have immediate (relative to crossing space) contact with host cells to infect and evolve.
The only reason it wouldn't be happening on Earth is if the Earth is completely unsuitable for it. Even if both are happening, the vast distances and harsh nature of space should shift the equilibrium strongly towards native viruses. But if the Earth is unsuitable for it then how are viruses able to survive and reproduce on a planet that's so unsuitable for them?
- qqqqquinnnnn 7y agoI think it's a complexity problem. Someone downthread pointed out that there are some viruses that are small - so small they consist of only two genes. It's possible that the super simple minimalist viruses are spontaneously produced and abundant in the universe. If all that's necessary is a strand of nucelic acids and a repetitive peptide unit, then it's within the realm of possibility that these would form simply because it's thermodynamically favorable for them to fall together in some systems. Then, if they encounter a living being, they're able to piggyback on it to multiply, mutate, and recombine. This could be further supported by the fact that viruses can coinfect cells and effectively transfer genetic and protein material between each other. By this model the simplest viruses are just products of chemistry that, when exposed to life, gradually become more and more complex. I guess the underlying point is that they could very well be forming on earth, continuously. If they are, then that would explain the baffling, unending diversity. They're just always forming new genetic material that gets iterated on until it works well.