When discussing whether Youtube should or should not suppress a particular person / point of view it is not conductive to bring up the fact that Youtube has lit

When discussing whether Youtube should or should not suppress a particular person / point of view it is not conductive to bring up the fact that Youtube has little (financial, legal) obligation to not suppress anything. Frankly they are able to do whatever they want, but I reckon we can at least agree that this wouldn't necessarily be desirable. And yes it is a problem to have this much depend on the decisions of a single organisation, as they are wrong no matter what they do, and frankly they don't have the mandate to make such decisions to begin with.