3 ms·
That's an interesting, and non-trivial, suggestion. I would love to see mail clients try to figure out, given several raw messages, what the flow of the conver
by einpoklum 7y ago
That's an interesting, and non-trivial, suggestion.
I would love to see mail clients try to figure out, given several raw messages, what the flow of the conversation/thread is like, then offer a canonical representation of that conversation, with perhaps a focus on what a single message contributed to the whole. Or one of several representations, among which the user chooses. That would be quite neat - but like I said, it's not at all easy
- ColinWright 7y agoYup, that's what my tool does. It wasn't easy, it doesn't always get it right, but it's pretty good, and makes complex email conversations usable, even when people top-post.