> I don’t think it’s an echo chamber to tell both sides of a story. But that was not OP's complain. The OP just feels strongly about an issue, and just because

> I don’t think it’s an echo chamber to tell both sides of a story. But that was not OP's complain. The OP just feels strongly about an issue, and just because a publication known for publishing terse and non-in-depth but otherwise correct articles managed to not cover a detail the OP's feels strongly about... That doesn't mean it is biased, doesn't it? In the end,if you think about it, the OP is just complaining that the publication doesn't share his personal bias, and the OP feels so strongly and is so adamant in pushing his personal world view that a single slip in a single article published in a single edition is interpreted as an offense so aggravating that he accuses the whole publication of not being trusted. This alone says more about the accusers than the target of these baseless accusations.