2 ms·
You're right, I meant normal, not random. (Fixed) And I didn't mean to imply that I'm any better than a novice. I just know enough to know to always check that
by beerandt 7y ago
You're right, I meant normal, not random. (Fixed)
And I didn't mean to imply that I'm any better than a novice. I just know enough to know to always check that assumptions for any given test needs to be valid. (It's been a few years since I've had to use any of this in a professional capacity.)
But is 30 plenty? Or is it sufficient?
As I remember, normal distribution usually requires a sample size of N=>30. (As in 30 is the minimum.)