4 ms·
They already have a policy to ban accounts that incite violence. (Which might have happened, the article doesn't say..) >"Information" that's not only going to
by ksk 7y ago
They already have a policy to ban accounts that incite violence. (Which might have happened, the article doesn't say..)
>"Information" that's not only going to get people killed but also is factually wrong is definitely fair game IMO.
We don't want an advertising company in a capitalist society deciding that. That's the whole point.
- sp332 7y agoWe don't want an advertising company in a capitalist society deciding that. Everyone has the responsibility to decide that! Their platform, their responsibility.
- ksk 7y agoOkay? Then consider my comment as a protest.
- julybuffalo 7y agoThis is actually an extremely gray legal area. The only reason platforms are viable is because they have legal protections that don't make them responsible for user content. At some level of "taken responsibility" (which I think should have been passed), they should be considered publishers and be stripped of their legal protections.