4 ms·
That could be an acceptable trade off for some applications. I could see this being useful for companies that host a lot of images. You only need to encode an i
by fredophile 7y ago
That could be an acceptable trade off for some applications. I could see this being useful for companies that host a lot of images. You only need to encode an image once but pay the bandwidth costs every time someone downloads it. Decoding speed probably isn't the limiting factor of someone browsing the web so that shouldn't negatively impact your customer's experience.
- imhoguy 7y ago> Decoding speed probably isn't the limiting factor of someone browsing the web so that shouldn't negatively impact your customer's experience. Unless it is with battery powered devices. However I would say that with general web browsing without ad-blocking it wouldn't count much either it terms of bandwidth or processing milliwatts.