3 ms·
Opting to listen to Navarro over Fauci is a very odd choice. Look, I get that certain discussions on this damn site resist dragging politics into it all, but t
by Klonoar 7y ago
Opting to listen to Navarro over Fauci is a very odd choice.
Look, I get that certain discussions on this damn site resist dragging politics into it all, but this is pretty important: Navarro has nowhere near the qualifications that Fauci does and there is no reason to listen to him on this.
You're contributing to a larger problem with misinformation at a time when it's not needed. Listen to the medical professional, not the economist.
- tptacek 7y agoI think he's just relying on Navarro's reporting that HCQ is being used in NYC, which, it clearly is; it looks like it's being tried all over the place. You can probably safely quote administration officials on something that simple. If he quoted Navarro saying HCQ was working, that would be problematic, especially because it doesn't seem to be working.
- Klonoar 7y agoI don't interpret the comment that way, but more power to you if you do. Going on to note these places where it supposedly work(s|ed) is indirectly bolstering Navarro's status in a discussion where he shouldn't be involved, and more or less implying that it does work when it clearly isn't working as described.