4 ms·
The article doesn't disagree with that. Here's the relevant parts: "An event like this is thus a uniquely powerful way of taking people's measure." and "Now
by maps7 7y ago
The article doesn't disagree with that. Here's the relevant parts:
"An event like this is thus a uniquely powerful way of taking people's measure."
and
"Now that we've seen the results, let's remember what we saw, because this is the most accurate test of credibility we're ever likely to have. I hope."
- jacquesm 7y agoSorry, but no. There have been thousands if not tens of thousands of such testable events over the last couple of years and in not even a single case has this led to repercussions against those that lied. Nobody's measure has been taken in a way that they cared about. We can record this one and likely it won't make any difference either. It's just whose team you are on now, not about whether there is anything truthful being said.
- maps7 7y agoWhat are you apologizing for? You could list some of the testable events if you want. When you have them listed reread the article and compare against it. Let me know how you get on.