4 ms·
It appears to be saying "authoritarian governments can use both direct persuasion and faceless persuasion. Democracies can't use the former, and can't use the l
by someguyorother 7y ago
It appears to be saying "authoritarian governments can use both direct persuasion and faceless persuasion. Democracies can't use the former, and can't use the latter unless they allow themselves to by the methods shown here."
Direct persuasion would be something akin to Weber's charismatic authority: the typical cult of personality stuff. A representative democracy, not having its identity tied to one singular leader, can't do that.
- andrewprock 7y agoDemocracies use direct persuasion extensively, typically on non-majority groups, for obvious reasons.
- mirimir 7y agoYou're using "direct persuasion" differently from parent. And I have no clue which is accepted. Parent seems to equate "direct persuasion" with "charismatic persuasion", but for you it seems more like coercion. Right?
- andrewprock 7y agoI read "direct persuasion" as a reference to "authoritarian control" as quoted from the Wikipedia article.
- mirimir 7y agoOK, makes sense.