3 ms·
My experience is the opposite: while there certainly was a time when I felt DDG actually respected my queries [1] that time is now gone. The results I get often
by msl 7y ago
My experience is the opposite: while there certainly was a time when I felt DDG actually respected my queries [1] that time is now gone. The results I get often have very little to do with what I typed in the search box. I find myself resorting to !g more often than ever before.
[1] I seem to have thought so in last December: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18665232 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18665232
- eitland 7y ago> while there certainly was a time when I felt DDG actually respected my queries [1] that time is now gone. I sometimes wonder if they've hired some ex-googlers lately because yes, this is my experience as well ;-)
- Jaruzel 7y agoAfter the last bout of anti-google posts on HN about a month ago, I took the comment advice and switched fully to DDG. My experience was horrible. I don't tend to search 'popular' subjects, only technical ones, and hobbyist stuff. DDG was just plain useless for this, I had to switch back to google after about a week as I was using the !g prefix almost all the time.
- chongli 7y agoThis was my experience as of a year ago. Nowadays when I do a search on DDG (my default choice) the results are terrible. Then I add !g and the results are even worse. I’ve had so many recent searches for information on technical subjects result in abject failure, leaving me to throw my hands in the air in frustration. It’s gotten so bad that I’ve installed BasiliskII and SheepShaver [1] just so I can relive the nostalgia of the days when I had my first Macintosh, before I’d even had access to the Internet for the first time. The help system and the documentation for software back then was so much more exhaustive than it is today! [1] https://www.emaculation.com/doku.php/mac_emulation https://www.emaculation.com/doku.php/mac_emulation