3 ms·
Rust uses the "turbo fish" to get around this. Your example wouldn't compile unless a and b where valid variable names. a::<b> (c) Is how you instantiate
by unlinked_dll 6y ago
Rust uses the "turbo fish" to get around this. Your example wouldn't compile unless a and b where valid variable names.
a::<b> (c)
Is how you instantiate a generic. It's not that ugly. Bigger problem is value type generics/const generics where you want to do some logic like
a<b > c>
- cwzwarich 6y ago> Bigger problem is value type generics/const generics How does Rust solve the ambiguities with const generics?
- chrismorgan 6y agoThe expression must be wrapped in curly braces: Type<{ expression }>
- monocasa 6y agoThe ambiguous const generics have to be surrounded by { }: fn function<T, { ambigous const generic expression }>(arg1: T) -> T {
- unlinked_dll 6y agoI believe the current proposal (partially supported on nightly) is to require expressions in generic arguments to be enclosed in {}