IMO haskells way of defining type parameters with forall is the best option. It doesn't fit with C-style function definitions though. It's kind of a stupid thi

IMO haskells way of defining type parameters with forall is the best option. It doesn't fit with C-style function definitions though. It's kind of a stupid thing to rant over. Whether a language uses <> or [] is the least interesting thing about it, but that doesn't stop everyone from bikeshedding.