> If it leaves a lot of people with pulmonary scar tissue that's a big deal. I think it's simply to early, maybe in the next 1-3 years you can have a more prec

> If it leaves a lot of people with pulmonary scar tissue that's a big deal. I think it's simply to early, maybe in the next 1-3 years you can have a more precise picture. We don't know if people with pulmonary scar tissue will end up recovering, or if it's permanent damage (from what I've seen it will depend on many variables, age being one of them). Even for mortality rate, we need to see this through to collect unbiased data from USA and Europe.