4 ms·
If you call him on it, he might use more scrutiny next time. We definitely don't win by not trying.
by DangitBobby 7y ago
If you call him on it, he might use more scrutiny next time. We definitely don't win by not trying.
- toss1 7y agoSadly, it is more likely, you'll get in a mudslinging contest with a troll paid to spread desinformatsiya. You'll make sensible responses, then get back either some whataboutism with a supposedly supporting but irrelevant article link, insulting meme, or some other technique designed to destroy good-faith discussion or the concept of truth. Repeat a few cycles and then lookup the account and find that it is either new w/few followers or has a history of troll/bot activity that as analyzed by sites like Bot Sentinel [1]. Then, you report as fake and block. The only exceptions I've found were not to people posting articles, but making comments, where you can sometimes wind up in a discussion. They are professionals (of varying skill), you are the person who can't tell he is the mark. This is almost always a game where the only winning move is to not play. [1] https://botsentinel.com/ https://botsentinel.com/
- netsharc 7y agoIt'd be more comforting if they're being paid or they're bots, but the depressing truth is, many many people probably believe the conspiracy theories they believe.
- toss1 7y agoToo many of both edit: tl;dr: Don't try to argue with conspiracy theorists - they are already immunized against evidence and reason.