No, 1/3 are not expected to survive. If you read the article, they're expecting 90% to either die or have organ damage. So out of 50 patients, they's expectin

No, 1/3 are not expected to survive. If you read the article, they're expecting 90% to either die or have organ damage. So out of 50 patients, they's expecting 2 patients to walk out of the hospital with some kind of normal life. Ventlators don't appear to tbe the answer beyond, "Well, we tried to do something. Too bad they don't work." The additional problem is that using ineffective ventilators kills your hospital staff for little gain. In SARs-1 (2002) in Toronto, more hospital staff got infected or died than in the general population. Hospital ventilation systems circulate airborne diseases. Now that we have data that ventilators don't work, we need to look at what the next steps are. There's no point in destroying the economy waiting for ventilators when they're not a treatment for corona virus.