4 ms·
> And I was told I had to answer 1, 2, or 3! Really? That just isn't very good. Of course, death is another reason, but there may also be many other reasons th
by zzo38computer 7y ago
> And I was told I had to answer 1, 2, or 3! Really?
That just isn't very good. Of course, death is another reason, but there may also be many other reasons they did not consider; they will need to add at least two more options, one for "other reason not listed" and one for "refuse to answer".
- ajeet_dhaliwal 7y agoI see this a lot more now. I think it’s a misguided strategy around trying to reduce the number of people choosing ‘other’ if it’s available because data from is seen as not useful. They don’t seem to realize that by limiting options in this way they will only pollute the results altogether with people just picking anything to get to the next step.
- perilunar 7y agoWell strictly speaking, #1 is the correct answer. It will unfortunately be the final answer for all of us.