4 ms·

i'm making one that replaces that psyop name with the disease's actual name: SARS-2.

• dragonwriter 7y ago
  > i'm making one that replaces that psyop name with the virus's actual name: SARS-2. The virus's actual name is SARS-CoV-2, the disease’s actual name is COVID-19. [0] SARS-2 is the name of neither, and neither of the actual names is a “psyop name” and calling it that is serious tinfoil hat territory. [0] https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2...
  • radenska 7y ago
    meant disease; point stands: IN 2002 the virus was named SARS-CoV and the disease SARS
    • dragonwriter 7y ago
      > IN 2002 the virus was named SARS-CoV and the disease SARS Yes, and...so what? There's no consistent relationship between naming of diseases and naming of related viruses, so trying to paint a conspiracy out of the fact that a pattern you've extrapolated from one other example (and which is takes ignoring most every other disease/virus pairing to paint as the normal pattern) wasn't followed is, again, serious tinfoil hat territory. The actual name of the disease is not SARS-2, nor is there any particular reason it should be.
      • radenska 7y ago
        you are a eunuch nigger cattle. stay docile and mindless for the WHO