4 ms·
What's up with the BBC even writing that there is "no credible link" between the two? Why qualify with "credible", when it's more correct to say "the two are un
by bonchicbongenre 7y ago
What's up with the BBC even writing that there is "no credible link" between the two? Why qualify with "credible", when it's more correct to say "the two are unrelated", ie indicating that there is no link whatsoever.
Then again, maybe it's a lost cause, and no amount of clear editing would get the point across to the unthinking idiots who harm us all.
- senectus1 7y agoyou have to say it that way... if you say there is no link then you're immediately discounting without considering evidence. Then you break what the scientific method is all about. Evidence must be considered then thrown out or used based on its merits.