3 ms·
I'm not talking about locking down early, I'm talking about starting a crash program to produce masks and tests, organizing a national system to redirect resour
by roywiggins 7y ago
I'm not talking about locking down early, I'm talking about starting a crash program to produce masks and tests, organizing a national system to redirect resources like masks and ventilators, etc. If we had the testing capacity we have now a month ago, we would be in a much better position.
We didn't know how much it was spreading in the US because we weren't testing cases that didn't have a nexus to China/SK. So we had no idea what the spread was like and there was no data to go on to inform decisions to lock down. Seattle only got there early because some local flu researchers disobeyed their own IRB rules and tested cases for the virus without approval.
California seems to have gotten the lockdown about as early as was practical and has done much better than NYC, so they're actually doing well, all things considered.
- ericjang 7y agoI'm talking about starting a crash program to produce masks and tests, organizing a national system to redirect resources like masks and ventilators, etc. Pretend for a second that you're Andrew Cuomo on January 1, 2020. What information would you have to justify this crash program? Pretend that you're Andrew Cuomo on April 4, 2020. You're aware of what stage China is in. What would you do differently?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- mercer 7y ago> Pretend that you're Andrew Cuomo on April 4, 2020. You're aware of what stage China is in. What would you do differently? I would not make cuts to Medicaid, for one.
- roywiggins 7y agoI don't know. He was hamstrung by federal rules on tests, for instance. NY was not allowed to go it on their own. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2020/04/03/coronavirus-cdc-test-kits-public-health-labs/?arc404=true https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2020/04/03/cor...
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]