I don't see how obvious discrepancies between the official Wuhan death toll and on-the-ground accounts constitute "wild" derivations. Moreover, Radio Free Asia

I don't see how obvious discrepancies between the official Wuhan death toll and on-the-ground accounts constitute "wild" derivations. Moreover, Radio Free Asia is quoting named residents, so this cannot plausibly be described "anonymously sourced US propaganda" or "fake news". [1] In general, I think one should be skeptical of any statistics produced by a totalitarian dictatorship for Western consumption. [1] https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/wuhan-deaths-03272020182846.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/wuhan-deaths-03272020...