3 ms·
> In a sense, this is an example of the US responding in kind to something that Europe has already done. Is this meant to be funny ? /s Seems like a kiddy mo
by jojo2000 7y ago
> In a sense, this is an example of the US responding in kind to something that Europe has already done.
Is this meant to be funny ? /s
Seems like a kiddy moral statement. Europe has done so many bad things in the past, but US currently has the lead !
This affair learns us some interesting things :
1) nation states are the current structure that defends people, a statement which was challenged by the creation of EU, and will try to protect their people before others.
2) Global trade cannot abolish the aforementioned statements.
Pick your conclusion. Mine currently is :
States have lost self-reliance based on global trade doctrine and this trend should be reversed. Chicago school has made enough ravages.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 7y agoBased on the current actions, it would appear that moving away from global trade results in piracy ( and likely other unilateral actions ). If this moment teaches us anything, it is that globalization ( I hate myself for using this argument already ) is actually a net good for us as a human kind. So no, I believe your conclusion is incorrect. That trend should not be reversed as we need sufficiently interconnected world so that all interested parties think long and hard before they press the wrong button. MAD at its finest.
- TechBro8615 7y agoIf globalization is a net positive, does the same logic hold for centralization of internet services? Here at HN we are largely proponents of decentralization, arguing it leads to a stronger whole. And yet when speaking of geopolitics we seem to have a blindspot and the same logic does not apply. I wonder why this is.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 7y agoIt is a valid point, but I have no answer other that different type of systems may follow different types of rules ( as in, centralization may not be good for every system ).