3 ms·
Not a comment on the design, but rather just something that always bugs me when I see it: "Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
by coderdude 16y ago
Not a comment on the design, but rather just something that always bugs me when I see it:
"Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Richard Stallman"
© 2011 is sufficient.
- gcb 16y agodammit! and i was hopping to use his flute-playing picture as my own!
- alain94040 16y agoAre you sure? If some of your content was written in 1996, you'd be trying to buy you extra protection by claiming that it's copyrighted in 2011. Not that it woud matter for another 70 years or so, but still...
- coderdude 16y agoYeah, I'm sure. Copyright in the United States is implicit anyway and writing "I wrote this in 1996" isn't a form of legal protection.