4 ms·
"the understanding" ought to be that the incident review isn't done.
by greglindahl 7y ago
"the understanding" ought to be that the incident review isn't done.
- bumby 7y agoCan you elaborate on what you mean? The understanding I was referring to comes from publicly available information corroborated by NASA
- greglindahl 7y agoMy apologies. I was remembering all of the people claiming that the facts were known before the initial investigation was done, but the initial investigation finished 3/6. There is a second investigation currently ongoing, an "organizational root cause assessment".
- bumby 7y agoNo worries. And yes, I remember how much people jumped to all kinds of conclusions after the event first happened. I think what you mean is the "organizational safety assessment" (OSA) which will occur later this year.[1] Germane to my previous comment, this will focus more on the organizational culture that may have contributed to the failure (e.g., decision making in the presence of heavy schedule pressure). https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/category/boeing/ https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/category/boeing/
- greglindahl 7y agoI was quoting a news article about the "organizational root cause assessment". Sorry you were confused.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- bumby 7y agoI was quoting the industry term. RCA is generally something different
- greglindahl 7y agoPerhaps you could take that up with the space journalists who used it? I’m not that interested in nitpicking, personally.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- bumby 7y agoI couldn’t find any sources using that term. It might be an issue of quoting unreliable sources. Not really nitpicking in my estimation as they are different perspectives. OSAs are solely looking at workplace culture. RCA has a broader scope.