2 ms·
My impression has been exactly the opposite - aside from full-internet on smartphones (not to say it isn't a big deal), new features in the US lag by something
by T-R 16y ago
My impression has been exactly the opposite - aside from full-internet on smartphones (not to say it isn't a big deal), new features in the US lag by something like 5 to 10 years. QR code reading and easy contact transfer(like 赤外線) still aren't out-of-the-box features (hacked in by third party software like Bump), and most Americans don't know what a QR code is. We still can't pay for things at the grocery store or buy train tickets with a cell phone, whereas Japan has had FeliCa Mobile for 7 years now. Live TV on a cell phone is also non-existent in the US. In Japan, these are all so common that they're available on the free-with-plan phones.
Also, according to the Japanese Wikipedia article, the first camera phone was DDI(Wilcom)'s VP-210 in 1999, and they exploded in popularity with Sharp's J-SH04 on J-Phone(Softbank) in 2000.[1] The US, by contrast, got their first camera phone in 2002.
[1] http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カメラ付き携帯電話 http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/カメラ付き携帯電話
- mullr 16y agoQR Code support seems like a software and cultural issue; they have public awareness in Japan and are thus useful. But it's not like most phones don't have the horsepower to read the things. TV on phones is a matter of the local broadcast technology making it easier to support smaller recievers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1seg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1seg). And also (again) a cultural issue; what's the use case for watching TV on your phone in the states? In Japan, it's so you can watch baseball when you're on the train. But I'm with you about payment. I got a special iPhone case with a slot for my train card (icoca) just so I could feel modern. :)