> I'd prefer to use the tool that we understand is moderately secure, though flawed, rather than the tool that is a security unknown. That's really a weak argu

> I'd prefer to use the tool that we understand is moderately secure, though flawed, rather than the tool that is a security unknown. That's really a weak argument: bad is not better than unknown. And in this case unknown is not unknown. Jisti is OSS, has been reviewed as such, and has been around since way before zoom was even invented.