I think this is an important point not just in the context of Zoom, but every time privacy (or the lack of) gets thrown around in an argument. It's perfectly p

I think this is an important point not just in the context of Zoom, but every time privacy (or the lack of) gets thrown around in an argument. It's perfectly possible to have end to end encrypted email, text, payments etc, but: 1. You will always loose features. 2. The "endpoint" (you) becomes responsible for a much bigger part of the protocol. Most modern applied crypto is just shuffling trust and responsibility around.