3 ms·

IMHO these are better (counting in cases/deaths per million inhabitants is much more comparable than absolute counts): http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/ htt

by jaclaz 7y ago

IMHO these are better (counting in cases/deaths per million inhabitants is much more comparable than absolute counts): http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/ http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/ Namely (Sweden): http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/#covid-eu-norm2 http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/#covid-eu-norm2 http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/#rates-nordic http://nrg.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mjh/covid19/#rates-nordic

grey-area 7y ago
Those show cases not deaths, I'm not sure that's very reliable as a measure - the testing varies dramatically, it will be tempting for governments to undertest and it's hard to get hold of tests now. Just to pick one example the US has shot up to top place by cases in the last few days mainly because they started seriously testing. Personally I prefer graphs of deaths (normalised for population would be fine I guess), starting from 1st death or similar rather than arbitrary offsets in date as the spread only begins from the first cases (usually undetected).