SVC spatial and quality layers [1] sound like a really good solution to the bandwidth issue. From my (extremely limited) understanding, basically if you skip ce

SVC spatial and quality layers [1] sound like a really good solution to the bandwidth issue. From my (extremely limited) understanding, basically if you skip certain packets you get a lower resolution/quality stream. A client sends a single stream at the best quality it can tolerate, and then the SFU can forward whichever layers to each client depending on what resolution that client wants. What's the state of this in jitsi? I can only find limited info about SVC [2] and that is only on temporal layer. How much bandwidth does it even save in practice - maybe it's not worth the complexity trade-off? [1] http://webrtchacks.staging.wpengine.com/chrome-vp9-svc/ http://webrtchacks.staging.wpengine.com/chrome-vp9-svc/ [2] https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-videobridge/blob/master/doc/svc.md https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-videobridge/blob/master/doc/s...