3 ms·
This reminds me of the people who tried to sell Blender a couple of years ago [0]. [0] https://www.blendernation.com/2009/06/11/3dmagix-re-branding-and-selling
by antoineMoPa 7y ago
This reminds me of the people who tried to sell Blender a couple of years ago [0].
[0] https://www.blendernation.com/2009/06/11/3dmagix-re-branding-and-selling-the-free-software-blender/ https://www.blendernation.com/2009/06/11/3dmagix-re-branding...
- tyingq 7y agoThis appears to have significant amounts of functionality that the open source pdf.js does not.
- robocop2018 7y agoOr Linux Red Hat, iText Lib ( open sourced but under AGPL) etc. There is tons of open-source out there under commercial terms.
- lorenzhs 7y agoYeah but this isn't open source. It's proprietary with source available, despite what you claim in numerous places throughout this thread. You're building a proprietary product on top of an open source project. You also chose a name that creates the impression that you built the original open source project, which you don't appear to be contributing anything back to. Comparing yourselves to Red Hat has to be a joke, right?
- robocop2018 7y agoNo, Express will be available under dual AGPL/commercial license.