3 ms·
Sample size: 34, for determining "community smell" ahh yes how quantitative their metrics for that must be. Nooo, this isn't politically biased at all ;) They
by pdubs1 7y ago
Sample size: 34, for determining "community smell" ahh yes how quantitative their metrics for that must be.
Nooo, this isn't politically biased at all ;)
They didn't SEEK this outcome of their study to conform with currently in-vogue political trends, not at all-- it's in no way biased ;)
No, no, you see-- We must get men to think, act and communicate like women! And women to think, act and communicate like men.
Yes, that's the answer-- Confuse people into thinking they're the same while demonizing men and elevating women with fake, clearly ideologically biased, nonsensical studies which use terms like "community smell".
Neomarxists/diversity-outraged: Women and men are equal.
Neomarxists/diversity-outraged: Women are better than men. We need more women in positions of power! (Search: "Entryism")
Noo... this couldn't be biased by current fad politics... not at all ;)
/sarcasm
In case anyone is wondering why Woke/SJW/identity-politics neomarxist messaging suddenly increased in the media in the 2010-2020 timeframe--
Here's an interesting summary of how usage of woke & SJW terminology dramatically increased in NYT publications since 2010 (alongside its increase in other forms of media).
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/06/the-nytimes-is-woke.html https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/06/th...
The use of "Woke" & SJW terminology rapidly increased following the dissolution of Occupy Wallstreet movement in 2010.
Hint: It's almost as if media/politics/entertainment elites are encouraging the middle class to fight each other, rather than the top 0.001% ;)
- conductr 7y agoI'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact we have a racist/sexist/while(bad)-ist president and resurgence of all these feelings a portion of the country
- pdubs1 7y agoYes, orange man bad indeed. Now that we are in agreement, please check the link I shared. It is a coordinated campaign that began around 2010 to distract away from the occupy wallstreet movement. It's an obvious "divide and conquer" strategy to take the social pressure off of the top class of ruling economic elites.
- conductr 7y agoI read the link. It’s one paragraph and a bunch of graphs. I don’t dispute it’s some form of social engineering. I don’t think it has anything to do with occupy. There is a larger socialist movement going on in America. Look at Bernie. Maybe started as economic during occupy but turned to equality and acceptance for all. Gay marriage and a lot of other things were going on during this time frame.