3 ms·
>very few people who weren't prisoners starved to death [during WWII]. If it's relevant, 3 million people in India died due to widespread starvation during Wor
by rckoepke 7y ago
>very few people who weren't prisoners starved to death [during WWII].
If it's relevant, 3 million people in India died due to widespread starvation during World War 2 caused by British colonial and war-time policies. Additionally all their cloth production was used by the British war effort, so many Indians went without clothes during that period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943#Cloth_famine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943#Cloth_fa...
- gwd 7y agoRight, I remember listening to an episode of Revisionist History about that [1]. Outrageous and shameful. I'd have to listen to the episode again, but I think the most outrageous and shameful thing about it is that it wasn't actually necessary. The way Gladwell portrays it, they died mostly due to the personal spite of one person. [1] http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/15-the-prime-minister-and-the-prof http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/15-the-prime-minister...