4 ms·
The name makes sense, though they have a very explicit definition of violent which is laid out at the beginning of the book. (Which I suspect very few commenti
by jdmichal 7y ago
The name makes sense, though they have a very explicit definition of violent which is laid out at the beginning of the book. (Which I suspect very few commenting here have read.) The definition is that, by only acknowledging your own needs, you are attempting to persuade others to meet your needs and disregard their own. It's violent in the way that telling someone "you're worthless" is violent -- it's the implicit message in that attempted persuasion. "You're worthless; let's talk about what I need." This is why it has such a strong focus on everyone stating their needs, and working towards common solutions.
- nailer 7y ago> It's violent in the way that telling someone "you're worthless" is violent That is not violent.
- al_chemist 7y ago"How not to resolve a conflict?" by Anonymous Chapter 1 - definitions When the source of a conflict is definition of a word and somebody defines it, just say "No, it's not!".
- nailer 7y agohttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=violence&ia=about https://duckduckgo.com/?q=violence&ia=about