> Tit-for-tat works fine in one-shot interactions. No. The whole point of tit-for-tat is that it's a good strategy for iterations. It's irrelevant for one-sh

> Tit-for-tat works fine in one-shot interactions. No. The whole point of tit-for-tat is that it's a good strategy for iterations. It's irrelevant for one-shot interactions. This article is sort of aspirational and feel-good, but goes too light on the harsh reality that many negotiations are one-shot, and being the good guy in those is a great way to get creamed. (Been there.)